<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital IQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-268</guid>
		<description>I don't have enough toys, or I would have scored alot higher, but 108 is respectable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have enough toys, or I would have scored alot higher, but 108 is respectable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-269</guid>
		<description>I scored a paltry 102</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I scored a paltry 102</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-270</guid>
		<description>It's all about the toys, and obscure geek knowledge (bluetooth?).  Good stuff.

As Pavi said tho, the test is skewed towards someone with a lot of windows XP knowledge.  Linux users should score a lot higher than they probably do on these tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the toys, and obscure geek knowledge (bluetooth?).  Good stuff.</p>
<p>As Pavi said tho, the test is skewed towards someone with a lot of windows XP knowledge.  Linux users should score a lot higher than they probably do on these tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-271</guid>
		<description>I don't want to say what I got... I'm ashamed to call myself a computer engineer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to say what I got&#8230; I&#8217;m ashamed to call myself a computer engineer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Although I think anyone who scores a 185 should have their "Comments" number accurately reflected on their blog.  -40 for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think anyone who scores a 185 should have their &#8220;Comments&#8221; number accurately reflected on their blog.  -40 for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-273</guid>
		<description>erg. ya i dunno what happened. that hack i did the other day for my news comments have apparently thrown these off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erg. ya i dunno what happened. that hack i did the other day for my news comments have apparently thrown these off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RehabChick</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>RehabChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-274</guid>
		<description>94...pretty good...for a girl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>94&#8230;pretty good&#8230;for a girl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.mattandnancy.org/interesting-web-cites/digital-iq/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=92#comment-275</guid>
		<description>"The page you are trying to reach has moved."

Perhaps you should take a few negative hitpoints for posting a link that appears to be non-static? ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The page you are trying to reach has moved.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps you should take a few negative hitpoints for posting a link that appears to be non-static? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
