Of course, this is no evidence that Obama or McCain may or may not be the anti-Christ. I’m just making the case that by definition, you won’t overtly recognize the anti-Christ when / if he / she appears. And I think this is Matt’s point.

I think any guess at the anti-christ will leave one looking foolish. I might have also been referring to McCain. But probably not.

Keep in mind, I used to have Bono pretty high up on my list too, and I love Bono.

Anyone who carries a revolutionary message and is wildly popular needs to be scrutinized very very very closely.

The other problem is that the ideals of unconditional acceptance and love are being accepted by religious and secular society alike while atheistic influence is denouncing objective morality (which can’t exist if there is no God) and so are calling into question responsibility to follow said morality.

And so the root problem, they say, is that religious people hold to an inflexible ethic that many don’t quite see. So my political position is to give them Jesus in the hope that it will open up their eyes. Its a crazy business.