Comments on: Amusing http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:59:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: wagner http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-198 wagner Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-198 yeah it took me entirely to long to understand that one. Of course that could be due to the fact that I am in fact not a giant computer nerd! yeah it took me entirely to long to understand that one. Of course that could be due to the fact that I am in fact not a giant computer nerd!

]]> By: wagner http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-199 wagner Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-199 yeah it took me entirely to long to understand that one. Of course that could be due to the fact that I am in fact not a giant computer nerd! yeah it took me entirely to long to understand that one. Of course that could be due to the fact that I am in fact not a giant computer nerd!

]]> By: wagner http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-200 wagner Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-200 ah I did it again ah I did it again

]]> By: matt http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-201 matt Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-201 its computer GEEK wagner, computer GEEK. its computer GEEK wagner, computer GEEK.

]]> By: wagner http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-202 wagner Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-202 yes I am a computer geek as you can tell by my fluent skills of double clicking the post button yes I am a computer geek as you can tell by my fluent skills of double clicking the post button

]]> By: matt http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-203 matt Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-203 I could probably work on programming protection from that happening... but that woudl take time and effort better spent on developing my photo gallery that i hope to be launching pretty soon. I could probably work on programming protection from that happening…

but that woudl take time and effort better spent on developing my photo gallery that i hope to be launching pretty soon.

]]> By: mike http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-204 mike Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-204 Man I'm shocked. Jason didn't even close his <p> tag. Font tags are so passe.</p> Man I’m shocked. Jason didn’t even close his

tag. Font tags are so passe.

]]> By: mike http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-205 mike Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-205 hmm I guess I can't put HTML in these things hmm I guess I can’t put HTML in these things

]]> By: wagner http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-206 wagner Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-206 GEEEKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GEEEKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: matt http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-207 matt Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-207 you should be able to put HTML in these comments... hmm you should be able to put HTML in these comments… hmm

]]> By: mike http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-208 mike Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-208 oh wait I did.. it actually interpereted it as html. sweet. hence why there is a paragraph where my <p> was supposed to be. oh wait I did.. it actually interpereted it as html. sweet. hence why there is a paragraph where my <p> was supposed to be.

]]> By: Pat http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-209 Pat Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-209 Well, speaking as someone who, ahem, hand codes, ahem, the HTML in his blog posts... actually, that is completely unrelated, I just wanted to throw it in. Shouldn't he put his paragraph notation at the BEGINNING of the paragraph? And really, there should be an HTML tag at the beginning, as well. I really like the fact that Fox Trot has some comics written exclusively for Geeks and Pop Culture fanatics, and no one else can get them. My mom will probably send me this one, too, having no idea what it is about. Well, speaking as someone who, ahem, hand codes, ahem, the HTML in his blog posts… actually, that is completely unrelated, I just wanted to throw it in. Shouldn’t he put his paragraph notation at the BEGINNING of the paragraph? And really, there should be an HTML tag at the beginning, as well. I really like the fact that Fox Trot has some comics written exclusively for Geeks and Pop Culture fanatics, and no one else can get them. My mom will probably send me this one, too, having no idea what it is about.

]]> By: matt http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-210 matt Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-210 I love Fox Trot as well. There are several things wrong with his "HTML" (that isn't actually HTML). <ul> <li>1. it is highly inaccessible (font size +3..., he should use relative font sizing (.8em, for example))</li> <li>2. is a deprecated tag. he should have used </li> <li>3. all tags need to have a closing tag.</li> I could go on... but i think that is enough.</ul> I love Fox Trot as well.

There are several things wrong with his “HTML” (that isn’t actually HTML).

  • 1. it is highly inaccessible (font size +3…, he should use relative font sizing (.8em, for example))
  • 2. is a deprecated tag. he should have used
  • 3. all tags need to have a closing tag.

    • I could go on… but i think that is enough.

]]> By: mike http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-211 mike Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-211 which is a depreciated tag? which is a depreciated tag?

]]> By: Derek http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-212 Derek Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-212 It is a tag that is no longer fully supported; basically obscelete as far as current web standards for styles and accessability are concerned. It is a tag that is no longer fully supported; basically obscelete as far as current web standards for styles and accessability are concerned.

]]> By: Pat http://www.mattandnancy.org/technology/amusing/#comment-213 Pat Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://mattandnancy.mattheerema.com/?p=63#comment-213 Yeah, you may know all this stuff, but I know not to put HTML tags in my comments and look like an idiot because they don't show up in the window . Hehehe. How deep does the rabbit hole go? Yeah, you may know all this stuff, but I know not to put HTML tags in my comments and look like an idiot because they don’t show up in the window . Hehehe. How deep does the rabbit hole go?

]]>